🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there existed some opposition. However no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.